<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMWare Guest Isolation Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xato.com/bl/2007/08/22/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability</link>
	<description>Mark Burnetts Windows Security</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mb</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>mb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/08/22/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>I don't use VMWare ACE, so I wouldn't be able to answer that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use VMWare ACE, so I wouldn&#8217;t be able to answer that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/08/22/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>How does this apply to the new VMWare ACE product? does it face the same problem?  Does it have countermeasures that would address this vulnerability (image encryption for example?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this apply to the new VMWare ACE product? does it face the same problem?  Does it have countermeasures that would address this vulnerability (image encryption for example?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mb</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>mb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/08/22/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>That is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OS</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>OS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/08/22/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>I suppose what you are explaining here applies only to VMWare workstations, server etc. but not VMWare ESX Server, correct?
rgds
OS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose what you are explaining here applies only to VMWare workstations, server etc. but not VMWare ESX Server, correct?<br />
rgds<br />
OS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to run arbitrary code on a VMware guest OS &#8212; Security Bytes</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>How to run arbitrary code on a VMware guest OS &#8212; Security Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/08/22/vmware-guest-isolation-vulnerability/#comment-267</guid>
		<description>[...] Burnett, an independent security consultant and author, recently posted a long description of a vulnerability in VMware&#8217;s scripting automation API that he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Burnett, an independent security consultant and author, recently posted a long description of a vulnerability in VMware&#8217;s scripting automation API that he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.186 seconds -->
