<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Symantec Cannot Always be Trusted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xato.com/bl/2007/02/27/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted</link>
	<description>Mark Burnetts Windows Security</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista Security News &#187; Why Symantec Cannot Always be Trusted</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista Security News &#187; Why Symantec Cannot Always be Trusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/02/27/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more here: mb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more here: mb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zers.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Symantec Cannot Always be Trusted</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>zers.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Symantec Cannot Always be Trusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/02/27/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more here: mb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more here: mb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB&#8217;s Windows Security &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Two New Vista Papers by Symantec</title>
		<link>http://xato.com/windows-security/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>MB&#8217;s Windows Security &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Two New Vista Papers by Symantec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xato.net/bl/2007/02/27/why-symantec-cannot-always-be-trusted/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] Although my last blog post criticized Symantec for its hyped FUD, these two papers, by the same author, definitely provide some good information and demonstrate the thorough research that Ollie Whitehouse has done on this matter. Furthermore, the author clearly states the true issues here and provides detailed research notes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although my last blog post criticized Symantec for its hyped FUD, these two papers, by the same author, definitely provide some good information and demonstrate the thorough research that Ollie Whitehouse has done on this matter. Furthermore, the author clearly states the true issues here and provides detailed research notes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.622 seconds -->
